Three numbers on one payslip
Take a plant supervisor on a monthly payroll register:
- —Gross salary ₹45,000 — the full contractual entitlement, before any deduction.
- —Employee PF ₹5,400 — 12% of gross, deducted from that entitlement.
- —Net pay ₹39,600 — what actually lands in the bank account.
- —Employer PF ₹5,400 — a fourth figure that does not appear on the payslip at all, paid by the business in addition to gross salary.
The two calculations
Net pay = gross salary − employee deductions. ₹45,000 − ₹5,400 = ₹39,600.
Total cost to employer = gross salary + employer contributions. ₹45,000 + ₹5,400 = ₹50,400.
The second number is the one most often skipped. The gross figure on a payslip understates what the business actually spends by exactly the employer-side statutory contributions — which never show up on the employee’s side of the calculation at all.
Why the employer contribution is an expense
Suppose the accountant debits Salary Expense for ₹45,000 and ignores the employer PF entirely. Is reported payroll expense correct?
No — it is understated by ₹5,400. The employer’s contribution is a genuine cost of employing that person and has to be recognised as expense, even though it never touches net pay. Omit it across a whole workforce, every month, and reported payroll cost sits quietly and systematically below the real figure.
Keeping the two 12% figures apart
In this example both the employee and the employer contribution are 12% of gross salary — a standard convention for organised-sector employment in India, not a universal fixed rate across every category of employment.
Because both are calculated on the same base they look identical, which is exactly why they get conflated. The employee’s 12% comes out of their pay. The employer’s 12% is paid separately by the business and never touches the employee’s number.
The same structure scales
A register of eight employees, from ₹45,000 at the top to ₹22,000 for a store keeper, follows one identical structure in every row: gross salary, employee PF deducted, employer PF added, net pay transferred.
Once you can reconcile a single row by hand — say ₹32,000 gross plus ₹3,840 employer PF = ₹35,840 total cost — the whole register is the same arithmetic repeated.
Common mistakes
- —Treating gross salary as the full cost of employment when budgeting a hire.
- —Booking salary expense at gross and omitting the employer-side contributions.
- —Netting the employer contribution against the employee’s deduction because both are 12%.
- —Reading net pay off a register and calling it salary cost.
- —Never reconciling the payroll register totals back to the general ledger.
Figures come from a fictional teaching payroll. This is practical educational content, not payroll, tax or legal advice — contribution rates, wage ceilings and applicability depend on the specific statute and the employer’s own circumstances.
Keep going
Have a question this guide didn’t answer? See the full FAQ or contact us directly.